Blumenthal & Merkley Lead Colleagues in Push to End CFTC Assault on State Prediction Markets Oversight

Blumenthal & Merkley Lead Colleagues in Push to End CFTC Assault on State Prediction Markets Oversight June 25, 2026 “Through engaging in this campaign of litigation and intimidation, the CFTC risks becoming an instrument and enabler of online prediction markets’ efforts to bypass states’ consumer protections and oversight, creating a race-to-the-bottom in gambling.” WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Jeff Merkley (D-OR) this week led 15 of their Democratic colleagues in calling on the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government to prohibit the  Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) from using federal funding to prevent states and Tribes from enforcing their gambling laws and gaming compacts with respect to prediction markets. “Recent lawsuits filed by the CFTC against states regulating online prediction markets will only fuel a gambling public health crisis and interfere with states’ and Tribes’ longstanding prerogative to regulate or even restrict gambling,” the Senators wrote. The Senators continued, “Online prediction markets, which have rapidly grown in popularity, are drastically different from the original intent of event contracts, which those companies claim to offer. Serving to hedge against financial risks, event contracts were largely limited to the agricultural sector and economic matters. Prediction markets, however, have distorted this purpose and infiltrated the world of sports, politics, and even foreign affairs.” The Senators continued, “States and Tribes, in their longstanding capacity as the primary regulators of gambling, have brought legal action or are considering new laws, rightfully identifying that online prediction markets offer services that are no different than gambling. However, these efforts have been stymied by the CFTC, which is attempting to assert exclusive jurisdiction over online prediction markets by suing those states that are enforcing their laws. To date, the CFTC has sued Connecticut, Illinois, Arizona, Wisconsin, New York, Minnesota, Rhode Island, and New Mexico.” “ Through engaging in this campaign of litigation and intimidation, the CFTC risks becoming an instrument and enabler of online prediction markets’ efforts to bypass states’ consumer protections and oversight, creating a race-to-the-bottom in gambling,” the Senators concluded. U.S. Senators Maria Cantwell (D-WA), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Martin Heinrich (D-NM), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Ben Ray Luján (D-NM), Chris Murphy (D-CT), Alex Padilla (D-CA), Jacky Rosen (D-NV), Brian Schatz (D-HI), Adam Schiff (D-CA), Tina Smith (D-MN), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) joined Blumenthal and Merkley in sending the letter. The full text of the Senators’ letter is available here and below. Dear Chair Hagerty and Ranking Member Reed, We write to urge you to prohibit the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) from using federal funding to prevent states and Tribes from enforcing their gambling laws and gaming compacts with respect to online prediction markets. Recent lawsuits filed by the CFTC against states regulating online prediction markets will only fuel a gambling public health crisis and interfere with states’ and Tribes’ longstanding prerogative to regulate or even restrict gambling. Online prediction markets, which have rapidly grown in popularity, are drastically different from the original intent of event contracts, which those companies claim to offer. Serving to hedge against financial risks, event contracts were largely limited to the agricultural sector and economic matters. Prediction markets, however, have distorted this purpose and infiltrated the world of sports, politics, and even foreign affairs. It can be hardly argued that wagers, like betting over the Super Bowl, serve the same hedging function as traditional event contracts. Further, as prediction markets have sought to circumvent state safeguards, their products have led to underage gambling, [1] gambling addiction, [2] and serious financial losses. [3] States and Tribes, in their longstanding capacity as the primary regulators of gambling, have brought legal action [4] or are considering new laws, rightfully identifying that online prediction markets offer services that are no different than gambling. However, these efforts have been stymied by the CFTC, which is attempting to assert exclusive jurisdiction over online prediction markets by suing those states that are enforcing their laws. To date, the CFTC has sued Connecticut, Illinois, Arizona, Wisconsin, New York, Minnesota, Rhode Island, and New Mexico. Further, the CFTC sought to block Arizona from enforcing its criminal and gambling laws against online prediction markets.Through engaging in this campaign of litigation and intimidation, the CFTC risks becoming an instrument and enabler of online prediction markets’ efforts to bypass states’ cons