Fighting Antisemitism Should Not Come at the Expense of the First Amendment
reason, not censorship. In Brandenburg v. Ohio , the Supreme Court made it clear that inflammatory speech
Full-text search across every press release in the archive. Matches the title and body, with English stemming, “vote” catches “voted” and “voting.”
18 results for “supreme” · Republicans · Kentucky
reason, not censorship. In Brandenburg v. Ohio , the Supreme Court made it clear that inflammatory speech
military, or the ability to transfer the Supreme Allied Commander Europe role to a European, until a series
jury subpoenas likely violate the conclusions of the Supreme Court. This abuse of power should not go unchecked … Carpenter v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that people have a privacy interest in their geo-location
Constitution provides such power to the presidency. No Supreme Court has allowed Congress to abdicate its role
privacy of one’s phone. In 1928, the Supreme Court in Olmstead v. United States ruled that federal … treatment of phone calls until 1968, when the Supreme Court changed the standard. In Katz v. United States
issued the following statement following the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision invalidating the executive … IEEPA) to impose tariffs unilaterally: “Today, the Supreme Court reaffirmed authority that has rested with Congress for centuries
issued the following statement following the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision invalidating the executive … IEEPA) to impose tariffs unilaterally: “Today, the Supreme Court reaffirmed authority that has rested with Congress for centuries
America First trade agenda following today’s disgraceful Supreme Court decision: “I fully support President Trump’s decision … reinstate tariffs. We cannot stand by while the Supreme Court undermines the America First trade agenda. Here
harmful changes to patent law that arose from Supreme Court rulings and the enactment of the Leahy-Smith … Invents Act has worked in concert with several Supreme Court decisions to erode this protection's strength
Senators who wrote an Amicus Brief urging the Supreme Court to uphold state bans on biological men participating … defense of protecting women’s sports at the Supreme Court,” said Congressman Riley M. Moore
believe, is a school zone." In 1995, the Supreme Court held the GFSZA unconstitutional, which prompted Congress … amend the bill in 1996. The Supreme Court has not ruled on the constitutionality of the amended
Washington, D.C.— Following the Supreme Court’s decision today in Trump v CASA, Trump v New Jersey
bipartisan, bicameral amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse the Eleventh Circuit’s ruling inMartin … overturning the Eleventh Circuit’s decision, the Supreme Court would reinforce the FTCA as Congress intended— empowering Americans
member of the legislative branch. Now that the Supreme Court has overturned the Chevron Doctrine, leaders on Capitol … These updates are vitally important as the Supreme Court’s recent rejection of the Chevron Doctrine still leaves
submitted a bipartisan, bicameral amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to reverse the D.C. Circuit Court’s decision
hardened criminals.” Washington, D.C. – Ahead of the U.S. Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling denying TikTok an injunction against
WASHINGTON, D.C.— Ahead of the U.S. Supreme Court hearing tomorrow, U.S. Senators Rand Paul (R-KY) and Edward … infringing on constitutional rights. The lawmakers remind the Supreme Court that the government is required to meet
administrative state should never rule our lives. The Supreme Court’s decision to dismantle Chevron deference stripped away … penalties—with little chance of success. Although the Supreme Court has overturned Chevron deference, SOPRA will codify