Massie, Khanna, Leger Fernández, Merkley, Luján Introduce the "Epstein Files Transparency Act II"
challenge the Department of Justice (DOJ) in court for the DOJ's failure to comply with the disclosure
Full-text search across every press release in the archive. Matches the title and body, with English stemming, “vote” catches “voted” and “voting.”
69 results for “court” · Kentucky
challenge the Department of Justice (DOJ) in court for the DOJ's failure to comply with the disclosure
June 30, 2026 Congressman Morgan McGarvey on Supreme Court Birthright Citizenship Ruling WASHINGTON, D.C. (June 30, 2026) – Today … McGarvey released the following statement after the Supreme Court ruled in Trump v. Barbara to block President Trump
Boston, Jr., Senior legal counsel to the Navy Court of Inquiry reviewing the USS Liberty incident
June 30, 2026 Congressman Morgan McGarvey on Supreme Court Campaign Finance Limit Ruling WASHINGTON, D.C. (June … McGarvey released the following statement after the Supreme Court ruled in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election
Congressman Morgan McGarvey Reacts to Supreme Court Ruling Allowing Trump to End Legal Protections for Haitians, Syrians WASHINGTON … McGarvey released the following statement after the Supreme Court ruled in Mullin v. Doe to end legal protections
June 30, 2026 Congressman Morgan McGarvey on Supreme Court Trans Athlete Ruling WASHINGTON, D.C. (June 30, 2026) – Today … McGarvey released the following statement after the Supreme Court ruled in West Virginia v. BPJ and Little
preserves parents’ ability to seek justice in court. This is an important step
miscarriages across the country. Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade , prosecutors and law enforcement agencies have
Monitor Accountability Act ; setting defined terms for federal court monitors. I was also proud to cosponsor and vote
Congressman Morgan McGarvey Reacts to Supreme Court Ruling on Louisiana v. Callais WASHINGTON, D.C. (April 29, 2026) – Today … McGarvey released the following statement after the Supreme Court ruling in Louisiana v. Callais: “This Supreme Court decision
civil or criminal cases. This includes family court matters such as child custody, child support, and divorce issues … intervene in legal disputes, whether in civil court or criminal court. If you need legal assistance, please call
Atlantic may well consider his illiberal court-packing, crony capitalism or restriction of free speech an acceptable price
Atlantic may well consider his illiberal court-packing, crony capitalism or restriction of free speech an acceptable price
wisdom, or lack thereof, of the court’s decision in this case to impose the strictest causation … withdraw entirely from the case. Regardless of the court’s willingness to entertain the argument that Jaynes
Milk Freedom Act prevents federal departments, agencies, or courts from taking any action to prohibit or restrict
bill is stronger and more capable of surviving court challenges. “Second, the Kids Act limits access
bill is stronger and more capable of surviving court challenges. “Second, the Kids Act limits access to online
Lexington, KY— Today, Greg Van Tatenhove, U.S. District Court Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, was named
censorship. In Brandenburg v. Ohio , the Supreme Court made it clear that inflammatory speech may be restricted only
subpoenas likely violate the conclusions of the Supreme Court. This abuse of power should not go unchecked … Carpenter v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that people have a privacy interest in their geo-location
coronavirus research pursued in Wuhan. Federal court orders yielded documents revealing that Fauci himself privately acknowledged concerns about
provides such power to the presidency. No Supreme Court has allowed Congress to abdicate its role
phone. In 1928, the Supreme Court in Olmstead v. United States ruled that federal agents who installed government … phone calls until 1968, when the Supreme Court changed the standard. In Katz v. United States, the justices
Section 230 of the Communications Act. The courts have largely ruled that Section 230 shields social-media companies
pursue direct civil action in state or federal court without first being forced into a federal no-fault … hurts someone, you can sue the company in court. You can hold them responsible through the normal legal