Goodlander Continues Fight to Lower New Hampshire Energy Costs, Petitions to Intervene in Liberty Utilities Rate Hike Case

Subscribe to our newsletter HERE. SERVICES Help With a Federal Agency Request Federal Funding FY27 Community Project Funding Request a Flag Resources for Students Apply for an Internship Military Academy Nominations Congressional Art Competition Congressional App Challenge Request a Tour and Tickets Request an Appearance or Meeting Know Your Rights Commendations and Greetings NEWS Press Releases In the News Press Kit Public Events and Town Halls ABOUT Meet Maggie Committees Legislation Voting Record CONTACT Email Maggie Newsletter Subscribe Office Locations NEWSLETTER SERVICES Help With a Federal Agency Request Federal Funding FY27 Community Project Funding Request a Flag Resources for Students Apply for an Internship Military Academy Nominations Congressional Art Competition Congressional App Challenge Request a Tour and Tickets Request an Appearance or Meeting Know Your Rights Commendations and Greetings NEWS Press Releases In the News Press Kit Public Events and Town Halls ABOUT Meet Maggie Committees Legislation Voting Record CONTACT Email Maggie Newsletter Subscribe Office Locations NEWSLETTER Search 09.01.26 Goodlander Continues Fight to Lower New Hampshire Energy Costs, Petitions to Intervene in Liberty Utilities Rate Hike Case Nearly 100,000 New Hampshire ratepayers could see bills rise more than 16% under Liberty’s $35.8 million rate request Concord, N.H. — On Monday, Congresswoman Maggie Goodlander (NH-02) filed a petition with the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (PUC) seeking to intervene in Liberty Utilities’ pending rate case, as the utility requests changes to its permanent rates that would increase operating revenues by more than $35.8 million. If approved, the increase would raise a typical residential heating customer’s monthly bill by nearly 26 dollars — a 16.54 percent increase — and a non-heating customer’s bill by more than 12 dollars, a 20.52 percent increase, according to Liberty’s own customer notice. Those costs would fall on the nearly 100,000 New Hampshire customers Liberty serves across 35 cities and towns. Read the full petition HERE . If granted, Goodlander’s petition would make her an intervenor in the proceeding, allowing her to advocate for the interests of constituents and communities across New Hampshire’s Second Congressional District as the Commission considers Liberty’s requested rate increase, capital investments, and recovery of those costs from ratepayers. Liberty has also asked the Commission to approve a temporary rate increase of nearly $11 million, according to the PUC’s August 17 Order of Notice — an increase ratepayers could see on their bills as soon as November 1, months before the Commission rules on the full request. “Granite Staters are already getting crushed by the high cost of energy, and they deserve to know that every dollar they are being asked to pay is necessary and that Liberty is making the investments it needs to reliably serve our communities,” said Congresswoman Goodlander . “For months, I’ve been demanding answers from Liberty on behalf of families, small businesses, and communities that have been left in the dark about whether they can count on the natural gas service they need. Now Liberty is asking its customers to pay more. I’m seeking to intervene in this case because Granite Staters deserve affordability, transparency, and accountability, and I will leave no stone unturned in fighting for them.” Today’s filing extends months of sustained utility oversight from Goodlander’s office. Since convening local officials, developers, businesses, and other stakeholders in the Lakes Region on April 7 to examine Liberty’s refusal to connect new customers in Franklin and surrounding communities — a policy that has stalled housing and economic development for the roughly 5,000 customers Liberty already serves there — Goodlander has pressed the company for answers. Her June 11 oversight letter demanded specifics on the scope of Liberty’s refusal to provide service and Liberty’s plan to fix it. Liberty’s response left significant questions unanswered — questions that now sit squarely inside the PUC’s review of how Liberty’s capital investments, and their cost, will be recovered from ratepayers. The rate case turns on the very infrastructure spending at the heart of Liberty’s “moratorium” and decision to deny its customers service. Liberty’s own testimony lays out its plan to replace the aging 22-mile “High Line” pipeline serving the Lakes Region — the same project Goodlander has spent months investigating. Goodlander’s petition makes her distinct interest in this rate case clear: the same ratepayers Goodlander represents in Congress may be asked to disproportionately shoulder the cost of that investment. Lowering energy costs has been a defining priority of Goodlander’s time in Congress. She has called on the Public Utilities Commission to reconsider an Eversource rate hike, introduced bipartisan, bicameral legislation to accelerate hydropowe