U.S. Representative Morgan Griffith
Trump v. Barbara decision, where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that children born in the United States … States and Washington, D.C. where the Supreme Court has made clear that a Constitutional Amendment is needed
Full-text search across every press release in the archive. Matches the title and body, with English stemming, “vote” catches “voted” and “voting.”
126 results for “court” · House · Virginia
Trump v. Barbara decision, where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that children born in the United States … States and Washington, D.C. where the Supreme Court has made clear that a Constitutional Amendment is needed
Administration will protect whistleblowers and comply with any court rulings concerning Schedule P/C. In addition to Walkinshaw
ranks. This month, the Supreme Court of the United States decided that womanhood belongs to biological women
consistent with the Citizenship Clause and the Supreme Court’s 1898 decision in United States v. Wong … directly answers that concern. We are confident the Court’s six conservative justices would find that it meets
Civil Rights Act of 1964. Although the Supreme Court has limited the use of race in the admissions … Ranking Member Scott condemned the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold President Trump’s firing of Federal Trade
released the following statement after the U.S. Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship in a 6-3 decision … glad the courts recognized that President Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order was a blatant and unconstitutional attempt
issued the following statement on the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. Barbara ruling that the Trump … years after our nation’s founding, the Supreme Court rejected the Trump Administration’s attempt to rewrite
issued the following statement after the Supreme Court upheld President Trump’s firing of Federal Trade Commission … again, the Roberts-led majority in the Supreme Court has abandoned decades of precedent and weakened Congress’ authority
issued the following statement on the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision ruling that federal election-day statutes … people who participate. Today, the Supreme Court sided with the American people and preserved easier access
reproductive healthcare. But four years after the Supreme Court’s disastrous Dobbs decision, that is the terrifying reality … Families. “The SAFER Health Act rectifies the court’s flawed decision by giving patients more control over their
fact, in sworn declarations before a Federal District Court, Director of White House Management and Administration Joshua Fisher
issued the following statement after the Supreme Court released two decisions permitting the Trump Administration to both expel … instability in their home countries. Today, the Supreme Court handed the Trump Administration the ability to turn
ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a major victory for gun rights. A Hawaii state law originally … laws struck down by our country’s highest Court. “Governor Spanberger is on notice. Her illegal gun grab
Today, on the anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
This approach offers a federal remedy through the courts that empowers recipients to respond and hold cyberflashers accountable … recipients of unsolicited sexual images to go to court to stop the harassment and recover reasonable damages, attorney
midterms. And now the Virginia Supreme Court has overridden the will of Virginia’s voters with this unprecedented … happens in the context of the U.S. Supreme Court repeatedly allowing partisan and racial gerrymandering. Just last week
released the following statement after the Supreme Court of Virginia’s ruling on the redistricting referendum: “Millions … field this November. But a partisan Virginia Supreme Court decided it knew better and, in a deeply flawed
following statement in response to today's Supreme Court's ruling. "Today’s Supreme Court ruling … decision, the MAGA Supreme Court gutted Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act — the primary tool Americans have
from disenfranchisement, but over the years conservative Supreme Court justices have steadily weakened those protections. Section 2 remained … Congress. “This latest decision by the Supreme Court sets voting rights back decades. By creating a nearly impossible
statement on the decision reached by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in Louisiana v. Callais … Section 2, the conservative majority of the Supreme Court leaves it powerless to address racial discrimination
absurd. It’s destined to fail in court. But clearly Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche is auditioning hard
most fundamental checks in our system. The Supreme Court compounded this failure by granting sweeping immunity
continues to impose tariffs despite the recent Supreme Court ruling and the Administration’s unclear plan to refund
processing these applications following a June 2025 federal court order lifting the administrative freeze on parole renewals … processing these applications following the June 2025 federal court order1 lifting the administrative freeze on parole renewals, many
processing these applications following a June 2025 federal court order lifting the administrative freeze on parole renewals … processing these applications following the June 2025 federal court order1 lifting the administrative freeze on parole renewals, many