Full-text search across every press release in the archive. Matches the title and body, with English stemming, “vote” catches “voted” and “voting.”
126 results for “court” · Senate · Maryland
consideration in this matter. Legal experts and federal courts have determined that a “thing of value need … consideration in this matter. Legal experts and federal courts have determined that a “thing of value need
federal framework is delayed in the courts or weakened in practice. A credible federal initiative would build … federal framework is delayed in the courts or weakened in practice. A credible federal initiative would build
federal framework is delayed in the courts or weakened in practice. A credible federal initiative would build
seven protected characteristics, including sex. After the Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. Clayton County that sex discrimination … because of sexual orientation and gender identity.” Several courts have also held that LGBTQ+ individuals are protected from
introduced the District of Columbia Courts Vacancy Reduction Act, which would allow nominees to the local District … Columbia courts to be seated after a 30-day congressional review period, unless a disapproval resolution is enacted
released the following statement on a federal appeals court granting en banc review for two immigration judges challenging … joined by five of his colleagues, urging the court to grant a hearing en banc, outlining their concerns
November 2025, five Israeli organizations filed a High Court petition with expert affidavits calling these "preventable deaths, nothing … following an order of the Jerusalem District Court, and urge that the medical corridor now be permanently reestablished
submitting an amicus brief to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit urging the Court … federal workforce. The Senators requested that the Court reverse the decision of the MSPB and cancel the removals
Member of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Federal Courts, Oversight, Agency Action and Federal Rights, led 21 Senate … White House election czar previously sanctioned for misleading courts in election cases. Following these developments, we need
Hormuz in itself further constitutes hostilities. The Supreme Court, the Department of Defense, and OLC all have published … Supreme Court held in the Prize Cases in 1862, the “proclamation of blockade is itself official and conclusive
state law govern civil and criminal matters, and courts have repeatedly invalidated measures that single out a particular … state law govern civil and criminal matters, and courts have repeatedly invalidated measures that single out a particular
SNAP in history; refusing to comply with court orders to fund SNAP benefits during the government shutdown … SNAP in history; refusing to comply with court orders to fund SNAP benefits during the government shutdown
from the government. In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court has unambiguously stated: “Freedom of speech and of press
across the nation for these proposals. A federal court ruled that Kennedy lacked the legal authority to threaten … declaration released in December 2025. The court found that Kennedy and HHS violated the Administrative Procedure
Senators . “These concerns have been borne out. Public court filings have confirmed that Mr. Olsen made debunked conspiracy … given that Olsen has been sanctioned in federal court for false election claims and is rejecting the results
issued the following statement after the Supreme Court significantly narrowed a key provision of the Voting Rights
submitting an amicus brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Harris v. Bessent , urging … Court to hear the case, reverse a decision by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals upholding President Donald
politically motivated. Thankfully, both a federal district court and the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor … landmark test for independence. Now, Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh said allowing Cook’s firing to go forward
staff have been blocked by courts—once again reveals the Administration’s overarching goal: rolling back consumer protections … though the Trump Administration had been arguing in court that there was no plan
staff have been blocked by courts—once again reveals the Administration’s overarching goal: rolling back consumer protections … though the Trump Administration had been arguing in court that there was no plan
submitting an amicus brief to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the case … this MSPB ruling, the Senators urge the court to grant a hearing en banc, or hearing
filing an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court inMiot v. Trump, a consolidated case challenging the Trump … holders. In the brief, the lawmakers urge the Court to preserve TPS protections, emphasizing the bipartisan support
that paid tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court are now due refunds. I predicted that Trump
rescission of the endangerment finding—the court ordered DOE to turn over records related to the working group
will of voters. “Since the Supreme Court’s disastrous Citizens United decision, huge corporations and deep-pocketed special … belongs,”said Senator Van Hollen. “The Supreme Court’s disastrousCitizens Uniteddecision opened the floodgates to billions in dark