U.S. Representative Morgan Griffith
Trump v. Barbara decision, where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that children born in the United States … States and Washington, D.C. where the Supreme Court has made clear that a Constitutional Amendment is needed
Full-text search across every press release in the archive. Matches the title and body, with English stemming, “vote” catches “voted” and “voting.”
112 results for “supreme” · Virginia
Trump v. Barbara decision, where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that children born in the United States … States and Washington, D.C. where the Supreme Court has made clear that a Constitutional Amendment is needed
join the DAR's ranks. This month, the Supreme Court of the United States decided that womanhood belongs
consistent with the Citizenship Clause and the Supreme Court’s 1898 decision in United States v. Wong
Civil Rights Act of 1964. Although the Supreme Court has limited the use of race in the admissions … June 29, 2026, Ranking Member Scott condemned the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold President Trump’s firing
released the following statement after the U.S. Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship in a 6-3 decision
issued the following statement on the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. Barbara ruling that the Trump … years after our nation’s founding, the Supreme Court rejected the Trump Administration’s attempt to rewrite
attorney, released the following statement after the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. Barbara : “President Trump … from the start. I am glad that the Supreme Court ruled against this attempted circumvention of the Fourteenth
issued the following statement after the Supreme Court upheld President Trump’s firing of Federal Trade Commission … Once again, the Roberts-led majority in the Supreme Court has abandoned decades of precedent and weakened Congress
issued the following statement on the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision ruling that federal election-day statutes … needs — of the people who participate. Today, the Supreme Court sided with the American people and preserved easier
attorney, released the following statement on the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. Slaughter , which will … fire independent agency heads at will: “Today, the Supreme Court set a precedent that will have grave consequences
seeking reproductive healthcare. But four years after the Supreme Court’s disastrous Dobbs decision, that is the terrifying
issued the following statement after the Supreme Court released two decisions permitting the Trump Administration to both expel … instability in their home countries. Today, the Supreme Court handed the Trump Administration the ability to turn
ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a major victory for gun rights. A Hawaii state law originally
rights attorney, released the following statement regarding the Supreme Court’s ruling in Mullin v. Doe and Trump … plus TPS holders across the country. Yet the Supreme Court is letting the Trump-Vance Administration terminate their
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, on the anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women
Hormuz in itself further constitutes hostilities. The Supreme Court, the Department of Defense, and OLC all have published … Supreme Court held in the Prize Cases in 1862, the “proclamation of blockade is itself official and conclusive
Hormuz in itself further constitutes hostilities. The Supreme Court, the Department of Defense, and OLC all have published … Supreme Court held in the Prize Cases in 1862, the “proclamation of blockade is itself official and conclusive
Hormuz in itself further constitutes hostilities. The Supreme Court, the Department of Defense, and OLC all have published … Supreme Court held in the Prize Cases in 1862, the “proclamation of blockade is itself official and conclusive
Trump’s illegal broad-based tariffs, which the Supreme Court struck down. Instead of adding unnecessary funding
based science. The resolution comes hours before the Supreme Court’s administrative stay in Louisiana … first introduced this resolution in 2023, following the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v. Wade , which sparked
midterms. And now the Virginia Supreme Court has overridden the will of Virginia’s voters with this unprecedented … This happens in the context of the U.S. Supreme Court repeatedly allowing partisan and racial gerrymandering. Just last
released the following statement after the Supreme Court of Virginia’s ruling on the redistricting referendum: “Millions … playing field this November. But a partisan Virginia Supreme Court decided it knew better and, in a deeply
released the following statement regarding the Virginia Supreme Court’s ruling to overturn a free and fair constitutional … free and fair election. If the Virginia Supreme Court had legitimate concerns about this referendum, the time
communities from disenfranchisement, but over the years conservative Supreme Court justices have steadily weakened those protections. Section … representation in Congress. “This latest decision by the Supreme Court sets voting rights back decades. By creating
following statement on the decision reached by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in Louisiana … Section 2, the conservative majority of the Supreme Court leaves it powerless to address racial discrimination