Luján, Merkley, Massie, Khanna, Leger Fernández Introduce the Epstein Files Transparency Act II
challenge the Department of Justice (DOJ) in court for the DOJ’s failure to comply with the disclosure
Full-text search across every press release in the archive. Matches the title and body, with English stemming, “vote” catches “voted” and “voting.”
2,888 results for “court” · Senate · Democrats
challenge the Department of Justice (DOJ) in court for the DOJ’s failure to comply with the disclosure
landscaping or agriculture. All according to our Supreme Court are reasonable suspicions that you do not belong here
just a pretense of some kind of a court proceeding to give a patina of respectability to something
that, facts from the judiciary, district courts and 31 cases have recognized that the Administration has violated court … refuses to rule out, refusing to abide by court rulings that they circuit court rulings that they disagree
that position – Schiff: If you went into court asking them to release it, it would be released … department’s position? Blanche : I wasn’t in court. I wasn’t the Deputy – Schiff
challenge the Department of Justice (DOJ) in court for the DOJ’s failure to comply with the disclosure
intelligence-led policing programs; strengthen prosecution and court programs to enhance case processing and judicial effectiveness; expand prevention … risk factors. This funding will serve local governments, courts, law enforcement agencies, prosecutors, behavioral health providers, community supervision
writing or to submit a declaration to the court. You’re an officer of the court, a member … able to make that assertion in a court filing or even in a letter submitted to this body
those redactions, including a protective order of the court. My folks, I think, as we speak, are seeking
assertion that has been contradicted by unsealed court documents—including a letter from then-Interim U.S. Attorney Danielle
after just 14 months on the job, after courts and grand juries blocked her from prosecuting the President … were confirmed, DOJ has literally violated dozens of court orders to advance Trump’s agenda. Last year
intelligence-led policing programs; strengthen prosecution and court programs to enhance case processing and judicial effectiveness; expand prevention … risk factors. This funding will serve local governments, courts, law enforcement agencies, prosecutors, behavioral health providers, community supervision
Administration will protect whistleblowers and comply with any court rulings concerning Schedule P/C. In addition to Walkinshaw
FY27 budget request for the United States Supreme Court—U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair … Elena Kagan and Amy Coney Barrett on the Court’s security funding request, lack of an enforceable code
voter data have been repeatedly rejected by the courts, you are resorting to public threats of prosecution … pause after it was blocked in court . Trump continues to push passage of his Safeguard American Voter Eligibility
letter follows a May 7, 2026, U.S. District Court order in a case brought by Pima County, Chicago … agency’s plans to comply with the court order. “Together, these rulings reinforce the need for FEMA
letter follows a May 7, 2026, U.S. District Court order in a case brought by Pima County, Chicago … agency’s plans to comply with the court order. “Together, these rulings reinforce the need for FEMA
member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, pressed Supreme Court Justices Elena Kagan and Amy Coney Barrett on judicial … Congressional appearance. This is the first time Supreme Court justices have appeared before Congress since 2019 and before
would specifically authorize survivors to: Seek a court order requiring DOJ to remove unredacted personal information from public
voter data have been repeatedly rejected by the courts, you are resorting to public threats of prosecution … pause after it was blocked in court . Trump continues to push passage of his Safeguard American Voter Eligibility
warrant application to freeze the funds, which the court rejected for lack of probable cause. Then, the Acting … sworn declaration providing that assurance to a federal court. [13] Moreover, reports have suggested that administration officials
Chief—a sentiment that even the U.S. Supreme Court agreed with,” Durbin said. “Senator Duckworth
Chief—a sentiment that even the U.S. Supreme Court agreed with,” Durbin said. “Senator Duckworth
legality of Trump's reductions remained before the courts. In 2021, Heinrich led Senate Democrats in calling