McConnell On War With Iran, Aligned Adversaries, and Fallen Kentuckian
Iran’s proxy wars, missile program, and nuclear ambitions taxed our attention and resources, the PRC benefited strategically
Full-text search across every press release in the archive. Matches the title and body, with English stemming, “vote” catches “voted” and “voting.”
21 results for “nuclear” · Senate · Kentucky
Iran’s proxy wars, missile program, and nuclear ambitions taxed our attention and resources, the PRC benefited strategically
Iran’s proxy wars, missile program, and nuclear ambitions taxed our attention and resources, the PRC benefited strategically
that some have compared to that of a nuclear weapon. That is why I’ve introduced the Risky
impunity when dealing with the world’s largest nuclear power. Congress should support realistic negotiations
President’s decision to degrade Iran’s nuclear program without putting a single American boot on the ground … ignored Congress in pursuing a reckless and bad nuclear deal with Iran. Unsurprisingly, that deal did not endure
fighter aircraft… The long-overdue modernization of our nuclear force… Reconciliation isn’t enough to support these major
devastating blow to the regime’s pursuit of nuclear weapons. “Now, less than a week later, the Senate … Article II authorities? “Was degrading Iran’s nuclear capability without expanding the U.S. military footprint in the Middle
extent to which the strikes damaged Iran’s nuclear program. We haven’t been briefed on the intelligence … Iran. If the Iranians don’t abandon their nuclear program, we can keep bombing them. And Iran
isolationists who downplay the threat of a nuclear Iran, was another indication in the right direction
forever war. Some seemed to push for nuclear negotiations with parameters eerily similar to the nuclear deal … Islamic Republic kept marching toward a nuclear weapon. And in response, Israel took the next logical step
hope is a fatal blow to Iran’s nuclear aspirations. “I also want to recognize the Marine Corps
aggression abroad, underpinned by an obsessive pursuit of nuclear weapons. “Israel’s bold response to the war thrust … created a unique opportunity to cripple Iran’s nuclear ambitions and strike a lasting blow to its hegemonic
stakes of allowing Iran to continue its nuclear enrichment operations and support for terrorist proxies. “Even more broadly
ally in the Middle East takes this murderous, nuclear-obsessed regime at its word. America must … direct strikes against the Iranian death machine and nuclear program will hasten this future for a region
grow the pipeline for unmanned technologies, modernize our nuclear triad, and expand shipbuilding capacity. But lumping reconciliation spending
that both of them – along with an erratic, nuclear-armed hermit kingdom – were helping a neo-Soviet imperialist
afraid to call Iran out if it had nuclear weapons? Is that the lesson we want the world
submarines (which sustain a critical leg of the nuclear triad). The costs of deterring war pale in comparison
debate over strengthening the deterrence of America’s nuclear triad. Whether to expand the U.S. military’s hard … target nuclear capability was an interesting question to pose to someone whose most recent job had been running
country that maintains the world’s largest nuclear arsenal. It is imperative that diplomats avoid kneejerk reactions
Cold War. In the age of nuclear weapons, great power wars cannot be won and therefore must