Shaheen Statement on Today’s Vote on the National Defense Authorization Act
amendments I voted for to both reduce the topline and withhold any authorization of funding for operations
Full-text search across every press release in the archive. Matches the title and body, with English stemming, “vote” catches “voted” and “voting.”
17 results for “topline” · Senate · Democrats
amendments I voted for to both reduce the topline and withhold any authorization of funding for operations
massive increase in the Defense budget—growing the topline from $850 billion to $1.14 trillion while additionally seeking
committee due to Republicans’ refusal to cut topline defense spending—which is already at a record high
amendment that would have lowered the topline spending number** (Washington, DC) – U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen … Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) to lower the topline spending number. Shaheen also voted for an amendment
Congress is going to meet that obligation.” More toplines on President Trump’s budget request will be distributed
resources we need to for this project.” More toplines on President Trump’s budget request are availableHERE. Supporting
thought I would share a list—just the toplines!—of what I am hearing from constituents about
Electricity FactsheetHere Read the Coal FactsheetHere National Toplines Donald Trump and Republicans’ Big Bad Bill willraise utility prices
Peak, as you know, 50% of our topline revenue and 60% of our bottom-line profit is derived
increase to specific DOT programs—but overall, your topline only increases $1.5 billion. So, you spell out about
remarks andhereto watch her questions. “The proposed budget toplines released last Friday fall well short of the President
intents and purposes, we had an agreement on topline funding. “But the call had been made, the call
cuts, but they are real and measurable. The topline increase Republicans are touting is a budgetary sleight
work with us. We are close on topline spending, but we need to know Republicans are willing
government open, and we don't even have topline numbers yet alone, let alone full committee bills
investments should be a part of ongoing bipartisan topline negotiations between appropriators. Rather than the $342 billion Republicans … really this should be part of the topline conversations we are having now as we hurtle toward
funding deadline fast approaching and we need a topline soon to be able to write and pass … extremely difficult to land an agreement on toplines—much less our annual bills—when you have a President