ICYMI: Booker Leads Bipartisan Amicus Brief to “Slam” Trump’s $1.7 Billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund”
Cassidy joining Booker in a briefing to the supreme court, which marks what we've talked about
Full-text search across every press release in the archive. Matches the title and body, with English stemming, “vote” catches “voted” and “voting.”
27 results for “supreme” · Senate · New Jersey
Cassidy joining Booker in a briefing to the supreme court, which marks what we've talked about
supports them while its lawyers walk into the Supreme Court to protect the pesticide companies. This
member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, slammed the Supreme Court’s recent decision in the Louisiana v. Callais … SCOTUS decision April 30, 2026 Booker: “What the Supreme Court has now done is eviscerate the Voting Rights
activists for a rally held at the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday, vowing to remain a relentless ally … over the weedkiller Roundup can proceed. As the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case, Booker called
corruption for a new generation of leaders: “The Supreme Court has taken several steps to make it harder
filed an amicus brief to the U.S Supreme Court inMonsanto Company v. John L. Durnellto ensure that pesticide … Points from the Brief: Senator Booker urges the Supreme Court to reject Monsanto’s request to grant through
accountability for ethics violations within the U.S. Supreme Court. U.S. Representatives Daniel Goldman (D-NY-10) and Hank … gifts, along with refusals to recuse by Supreme Court justices have eroded the public’s trust
after they were struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday by a 6-3 vote … afford it,”Senator Shaheen said.“Now that the Supreme Court has made it clear that the President
Friday of new global tariffs, even after the Supreme Court ruled his sweeping tariffs illegal, this morning Senator … just suffered this major setback by the Supreme Court. The American people have turned against him so clear
10/7: Booker, Whitehouse, Colleagues File Amicus Brief Urging Supreme Court to Reject Yet Another GOP Effort to Flood
released the following statement urging the Supreme Court defend states’ investigative authorities after they conducted oral arguments forFirst … people from accessing the care they need. This Supreme Court has failed to defend the right to choose
House Democrats filed an amicus brief to the Supreme Court opposing President Trump’s unlawful attempt to remove … Amicus Brief. Filing an amicus brief to the Supreme Court inTrump v. Slaughter, the lawmakers stood
Rights filed a bipartisan amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to overturn a century-old precedent that … rules of fair competition because of a flawed Supreme Court ruling—one that the Court itself has acknowledged
National Republican Senatorial Committee is asking the Supreme Court to strike down federal limits on expenditures by political … first possible opportunity,”continued the senators. The Supreme Court’s landmark 2010 decision inCitizens United v. FECstruck down
including Congress, the President, Vice President, and the Supreme Court – prohibiting the owning or trading of individual stocks
patients to seek relief. “Three years ago, the Supreme Court unjustly overturned Roe v. Wade, and opened … birth control without intimidation, harassment, or discrimination.” Although Supreme Court precedent recognizes a protected right to contraception, conservatives
Today,Senator Andy Kimreleased the following statement afterthe Supreme Court ruledto limit lower courts’ power to block President
Trump administration and dangerously conservative Supreme Court threaten the safety and security of LGBTQ+ individuals in the United
rule of law and obey the U.S. Supreme Court’s order that Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia be returned … descend our nation into a constitutional crisis. The Supreme Court has ordered the Trump admin to facilitate
Americans. His actions violate nearly a century of Supreme Court precedent and Congress’ well-established constitutional practice … unlawfully removing two FTC Commissioners. The law and Supreme Court precedent are crystal clear: Commissioners Slaughter and Bedoya
blatantly illegal and against a 90-year Supreme Court precedent. By sabotaging the FTC’s independence, Trump
Gideon Day, the day in 1963 when the Supreme Court decidedGideon v. Wainwright, a landmark case that recognized … 62nd anniversary ofGideon v. Wainright,the landmark Supreme Court decision which affirmed that in order to ensure
Kimreleased the following statement on the United States Supreme Court’s ruling that the Trump administration must … assistance approved by Congress. “The fact that the Supreme Court had to weigh
supports essential to upholding the promise of the Supreme Courts Olmstead decision to live one’s life
Vice President, the cabinet, as well as Supreme Court justices and federal judges. [The legislation] would ban them